en
×

分享给微信好友或者朋友圈

使用微信“扫一扫”功能。
作者简介:

方正伟(1986-),男,高级工程师,博士,研究方向为非常规油气储层地质学。E-mail: Slgfzw@163.com。

通信作者:

方正伟(1986-),男,高级工程师,博士,研究方向为非常规油气储层地质学。E-mail: Slgfzw@163.com。

中图分类号:TQ 028

文献标识码:A

文章编号:1673-5005(2025)05-0057-14

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2025.05.005

参考文献 1
贾承造,王祖纲,姜林,等.中国页岩油勘探开发研究进展与科学技术问题[J].世界石油工业,2024,31(4):1-11,13.JIA Chengzao,WANG Zugang,JIANG Lin,et al.Progress and key scientific and technological problems of shale oil exploration and development in China[J].World Petroleum Industry,2024,31(4):1-11,13.
参考文献 2
马永生,蔡勋育,赵培荣,等.中国陆相页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J].地质学报,2022,96(1):155-171.MA Yongsheng,CAI Xunyu,ZHAO Peirong,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration practices of continental shale oil in China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2022,96(1):155-171.
参考文献 3
黎茂稳,马晓潇,金之钧,等.中国海、陆相页岩层系岩相组合多样性与非常规油气勘探意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2022,43(1):1-25.LI Maowen,MA Xiaoxiao,JIN Zhijun,et al.Diversity in the lithofacies assemblages of marine and lacustrine shale strata and significance for unconventional petroleum exploration in China[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2022,43(1):1-25.
参考文献 4
刘惠民,李军亮,刘鹏,等.济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集条件与勘探战略方向[J].石油学报,2022,43(12):1717-1729.LIU Huimin,LI Junliang,LIU Peng,et al.Enrichment conditions and strategic exploration direction of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(12):1717-1729.
参考文献 5
蔚远江,王红岩,刘德勋,等.中国陆相页岩油示范区发展现状及建设可行性评价指标体系[J].地球科学,2023,48(1):191-205.YU Yuanjiang,WANG Hongyan,LIU Dexun,et al.Development status and feasibility evaluation index system of continental shale oil demonstration area in China[J].Earth Science,2023,48(1):191-205.
参考文献 6
刘惠民.济阳坳陷古近系页岩油地质特殊性及勘探实践:以沙河街组四段上亚段—沙河街组三段下亚段为例[J].石油学报,2022,43(5):581-594.LIU Huimin.Geological particularity and exploration practice of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang depression:a case study of the upper submember of Member 4 to the lower submember of Member 3 of Shahejie Formation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(5):581-594.
参考文献 7
赵贤正,金凤鸣,周立宏,等.渤海湾盆地风险探井歧页1H井沙河街组一段页岩油勘探突破及其意义[J].石油学报,2022,43(10):1369-1382.ZHAO Xianzheng,JIN Fengming,ZHOU Lihong,et al.Breakthrough and significance of shale oil exploration in Member 1 of Shahejie Formation of Well Qiye1H,a risk exploratory well in Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(10):1369-1382.
参考文献 8
姚红生,昝灵,高玉巧,等.苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集高产主控因素与勘探重大突破[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(5):776-783.YAO Hongsheng,ZAN Ling,GAO Yuqiao,et al.Main controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and significant discovery in second member of Paleogene Funing Formation,Qintong Sag,Subei Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2021,43(5):776-783.
参考文献 9
马存飞,黄文俊,杜争利,等.陆相湖盆页岩岩相分类方案及其意义:以沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2022,53(9):3287-3300.MA Cunfei,HUANG Wenjun,DU Zhengli,et al.Shale lithofacies classification scheme of continental lake basin and its significance:a case of E2 Member of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2022,53(9):3287-3300.
参考文献 10
刘惠民,王勇,杨永红,等.东营凹陷细粒混积岩发育环境及其岩相组合:以沙四上亚段泥页岩细粒沉积为例[J].地球科学,2020,45(10):3543-3555.LIU Huimin,WANG Yong,YANG Yonghong,et al.Sedimentary environment and lithofacies of fine-grained hybrid sedimentary in Dongying Sag:a case of fine-grained sedimentary system of the Es4[J].Earth Science,2020,45(10):3543-3555.
参考文献 11
王优先.陆相页岩油成藏地质条件及富集高产主控因素:以泌阳凹陷为例[J].断块油气田,2015,22(5):588-593.WANG Youxian.Geologic conditions of continental shale oil accumulation and main controlling factors of enrichment and high production:taking Biyang Depression as an example[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2015,22(5):588-593.
参考文献 12
昝灵,骆卫峰,印燕铃,等.苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油形成条件及有利区评价[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(2):233-241.ZAN Ling,LUO Weifeng,YIN Yanling,et al.Formation conditions of shale oil and favorable targets in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Qintong Sag,Subei Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2021,43(2):233-241.
参考文献 13
赵文智,卞从胜,蒲秀刚,等.中国典型咸化湖盆页岩油富集与流动特征及在“甜点”评价中的意义[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2023,47(5):25-37.ZHAO Wenzhi,BIAN Congsheng,PU Xiugang,et al.Enrichment and flow characteristics of shale oil in typical salinized lake basins in China and its significance for "sweet spot" evaluation[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2023,47(5):25-37.
参考文献 14
冯国奇,李吉君,刘洁文,等.泌阳凹陷页岩油富集及可动性探讨[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(6):1236-1246.FENG Guoqi,LI Jijun,LIU Jiewen,et al.Discussion on the enrichment and mobility of continental shale oil in Biyang Depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(6):1236-1246.
参考文献 15
李浩,王保华,陆建林,等.东濮凹陷古近系页岩油富集地质条件与勘探前景[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(3):33-41.LI Hao,WANG Baohua,LU Jianlin,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration prospects of Paleogene continental shale oil accumulation in Dongpu Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2021,45(3):33-41.
参考文献 16
刘惠民,张顺,王学军,等.陆相断陷盆地页岩岩相组合类型及特征:以济阳坳陷东营凹陷沙四上亚段页岩为例[J].地球科学,2023,48(1):30-48.LIU Huimin,ZHANG Shun,WANG Xuejun,et al.Types and characteristics of shale lithofacies combinations in continental faulted basins:a case study from upper sub-member of Es4 in Dongying Sag,Jiyang depression[J].Earth Science,2023,48(1):30-48.
参考文献 17
刘雅利,张顺,刘惠民,等.断陷盆地陡坡带富有机质页岩基本特征及勘探前景:以济阳坳陷为例[J].中国矿业大学学报,2021,50(6):1108-1118.LIU Yali,ZHANG Shun,LIU Huimin,et al.Basic characteristics and exploration prospect of shale in steep slope belt of continental faultedbasin:a case study of Jiyang depression[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2021,50(6):1108-1118.
参考文献 18
刘佳庚,王艳忠,操应长,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷民丰洼陷陡坡带深层-超深层碎屑岩优质储层控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2023,44(5):1203-1217.LIU Jiageng,WANG Yanzhong,CAO Yingchang,et al.Factors controlling the development of deep and ultra-deep coarse-grained siliciclastic reservoirs with high quality in the steep slope zone of the Minfeng sub-sag,Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2023,44(5):1203-1217.
参考文献 19
杨万芹,蒋有录,王勇.东营凹陷沙三下—沙四上亚段泥页岩岩相沉积环境分析[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(4):19-26.YANG Wanqin,JIANG Youlu,WANG Yong.Study on shale facies sedimentary environment of lower Es3-upper Es4 in Dongying sag[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2015,39(4):19-26.
参考文献 20
王勇.济阳坳陷古近系沙三下—沙四上亚段咸化湖盆证据及页岩油气地质意义[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2024,48(3):27-36.WANG Yong.Evidence of Paleogene saline lake basin in the 3rd and 4th members of Shahejie Formation in Jiyang Depression and geological significance of shale oil and gas[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2024,48(3):27-36.
参考文献 21
杨勇.济阳陆相断陷盆地页岩油富集高产规律[J].油气地质与采收率,2023,30(1):1-20.YANG Yong.Enrichment and high production regularities of shale oil reservoirs in continental rift basin:a case study of Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2023,30(1):1-20.
参考文献 22
陈世悦,张顺,王永诗,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系细粒沉积岩岩相类型及储集层特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):198-208.CHEN Shiyue,ZHANG Shun,WANG Yongshi,et al.Lithofacies types and reservoirs of Paleogene fine-grained sedimentary rocks in Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):198-208.
参考文献 23
王勇,王学军,宋国奇,等.渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷泥页岩岩相与页岩油富集关系[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(5):696-704.WANG Yong,WANG Xuejun,SONG Guoqi,et al.Genetic connection between mud shale lithofacies and shale oil enrichment in Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(5):696-704.
参考文献 24
王勇,刘惠民,宋国奇,等.济阳坳陷泥页岩细粒沉积体系[J].石油学报,2019,40(4):395-410.WANG Yong,LIU Huimin,SONG Guoqi,et al.Lacustrine shale fine-grained sedimentary system in Jiyang depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(4):395-410.
参考文献 25
张益粼,王贵文,宋连腾,等.页岩岩相测井表征方法:以准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组为例[J].地球物理学进展,2023,38(1):393-408.ZHANG Yilin,WANG Guiwen,SONG Lianteng,et al.Logging identification method of shale lithofacies:a study of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J].Progress in Geophysics,2023,38(1):393-408.
参考文献 26
YAN Jianping,HE Xu,HU Qinhong,et al.Lower Es3 in Zhanhua Sag,Jiyang Depression:a case study for lithofacies classification in lacustrine mud shale[J].Applied Geophysics,2018,15(2):151-164,361.
参考文献 27
王敏,朱家俊,余光华,等.罗家地区泥页岩岩相特征及测井分析技术[J].测井技术,2013,37(4):426-431.WANG Min,ZHU Jiajun,YU Guanghua,et al.The shale lithofacies characteristics and logging analysis techniques in Luojia area[J].Well Logging Technology,2013,37(4):426-431.
参考文献 28
刘喜武,刘宇巍,郭智奇.陆相页岩油关键甜点要素地球物理表征技术[J].地球物理学进展,2022,37(4):1576-1584.LIU Xiwu,LIU Yuwei,GUO Zhiqi.Key sweet spot factors seismic characterization of continental shale oil[J].Progress in Geophysics,2022,37(4):1576-1584.
参考文献 29
陈彦虎,毕建军,邱小斌,等.地震波形指示反演方法及其应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(6):1149-1158.CHEN Yanhu,BI Jianjun,QIU Xiaobin,et al.A method of seismic meme inversion and its application[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(6):1149-1158.
参考文献 30
刘玲,王琳霖,吴疆,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部彬长区块上石盒子组7段储层识别与预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2021,42(5):1124-1135.LIU Ling,WANG Linlin,WU Jiang,et al.Reservoir identification and prediction of He7 Member in Binchang block,southern Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2021,42(5):1124-1135.
参考文献 31
赵力民,郎晓玲,金凤鸣,等.波形分类技术在隐蔽油藏预测中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(6):53-55.ZHAO Limin,LANG Xiaoling,JIN Fengming,et al.Application of waveform classification technique in the prediction of subtle res ervoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2001,28(6):53-55.
参考文献 32
于红枫,王英民,李雪.Stratimagic波形地震相分析在层序地层岩性分析中的应用[J].煤田地质与勘探,2006,34(1):64-67.YU Hongfeng,WANG Yingmin,LI Xue.Application of stratimagic seismic facies technique to lithologic analysis in sequence stratigraphic framework[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,2006,34(1):64-67.
参考文献 33
漆家福,肖焕钦,张卫刚.东营凹陷主干边界断层(带)构造几何学、运动学特征及成因解释[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):8-12.QI Jiafu,XIAO Huanqin,ZHANG Weigang.Geometry,kinematics and mechanism interpretation of the major boundary faults in Dongying Sag[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(3):8-12.
目录contents

    摘要

    陆相断陷盆地陡坡深陷区页岩沉积厚度大、岩相类型多样、纵横向变化复杂,目前对陡坡深陷区页岩岩相分布规律认识不清,制约陡坡带页岩油选区选层与勘探部署。应用岩石薄片观察、全岩矿物X衍射、有机碳测试、测井解释、地震波形分析等技术对东营凹陷陡坡深陷区民丰洼陷沙四上纯上次亚段(E2s4cs)页岩岩相特征与分布规律进行系统研究。结果表明:民丰洼陷沙四上纯上次亚段发育富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩、黏土质混积页岩、长英质混积页岩及碳酸盐页岩4种主要岩相类型;洼陷厚度中心主要发育富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩,南部边缘水下低隆起区主要发育富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩,中间带主要发育富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩和黏土质混积页岩;从北部物源区到洼陷南部边缘,依次发育4种岩相组合,在平面上呈近东西向不规则条带状展布;从纯上次亚段底部到顶部,长英质混积页岩的分布范围逐步扩大且越过沉降中心,未受砂砾岩体整体退积的影响。

    Abstract

    The shale in the steep slope and deep zone of continental faulted basins is characterized by large thickness, multiple lithofacies types, and complex vertical and horizontal variations. At present, the understanding of shale lithofacies distribution in these zones is limited, which restricts shale oil target-area and layer selection as well as exploration deployment. Using thin-section identification, whole-rock mineral X-ray diffraction, total organic carbon analysis, well-log interpretation, and seismic waveform analysis, a systematic study was carried out on the lithofacies characteristics and distribution patterns of shale in the Upper Sub-member of the Fourth Member of Shahejie Formation (E2s4cs) in the Minfeng Sub-sag, located in the steep-slope and deep zones of the Dongying Sag. The results show that four shale lithofacies are most developed in the E2s4cs of the Minfeng Sub-sag: organic-rich laminated carbonate shale, organic-rich laminated carbonate-mixed shale, organic-rich laminated clay-mixed shale, and organic-rich laminated felsic-mixed shale. The thickness center of the Minfeng Sub-sag is dominated by organic-rich laminated felsic-mixed shale, while the low-uplift area on the southern margin mainly develops organic-rich laminated carbonate shale; the transitional zone is dominated by organic-rich laminated carbonate-mixed shale and clay-mixed shale. From the northern source area to the southern margin of the Minfeng Sub-sag, four lithofacies combinations are developed successively, forming an irregular east-west-trending strip distribution in plane view. Vertically, from the bottom to the top of the E2s4cs shale interval, the distribution of felsic-mixed shale gradually expands across the subsidence center and is not influenced by the overall retrogradation of the glutenite body.

  • 中国东部新生代断陷湖盆是重要的含油气盆地类型,在古近系普遍发育富有机质页岩,厚度大、分布范围广,且普遍处于生油高峰阶段,富含丰富的页岩油资源[1-4]。近年来,对该类盆地的页岩油勘探不断取得新突破[5-8],页岩油逐步成为中国东部老油区重要的资源接替类型。页岩岩相是连接宏观目标优选和微观储集品质表征的桥梁,是页岩油甜点评价的基本单元,揭示页岩岩相及其组合特征是页岩油勘探开发的基础[39-10]。随着取芯数量和测试数据的增多,对断陷湖盆页岩岩相的认识不断深入。断陷盆地页岩发育纹层状、层状、块状等多种沉积构造类型,近湖盆边缘层状岩相较发育,近凹陷中心纹层状岩相较发育;从矿物类型及含量来看,表现出多种矿物混积的特点;受构造背景、物源供应、气候变化、水动力条件等影响,单类岩相垂向厚度从几厘米到几米不等,不同类型岩相垂向叠置关系复杂、变化快;平面上岩相具有环带状展布特征或趋势;不同构造部位岩相组合类型存在明显差异,目前对不同构造部位页岩岩相组合类型及其分布规律的认识仍然处于探索阶段[10-16]。济阳坳陷东营凹陷是中国东部断陷湖盆的典型代表,富有机质页岩发育厚度可达200~1200 m,页岩油资源丰富,前期研究表明缓坡带纹层状泥质灰岩较发育,展布范围宽,陡坡带层状灰质泥岩较发育,展布范围窄[16-17]。随着页岩油勘探开发的不断深入,东营凹陷不同构造部位的岩相类型逐步被揭示,但对岩相特征及其分布规律的认识仍然比较局限,特别是陡坡深陷区页岩,受沉降速率大、近物源等影响,页岩沉积厚度大,长英质含量明显增加,页岩岩相及其组合垂向、横向变化更为复杂,制约陡坡带页岩油勘探开发选区选层评价。笔者以取芯资料丰富的陡坡带洼陷——东营凹陷民丰洼陷沙四上亚段纯上次亚段为研究对象,利用岩心实验对岩相类型进行划分,结合岩心实验结果与测井曲线解释成果识别单井、剖面岩相及其组合;基于地震波形分析开展平面岩相组合刻画,揭示岩相组合平面分布规律,并构建页岩及其组合分布模式。

  • 1 地质概况

  • 民丰洼陷位于东营凹陷东北部,北部、东部分别为陈家庄凸起和青坨子凸起。民丰洼陷北侧发育陈南断裂带,是北边界断层;向南靠近东营凹陷中央断裂带,辛镇断裂带为其南边界,将民丰洼陷和牛庄洼陷分隔;向西以胜北断层与利津洼陷分隔[18](图1)。民丰洼陷古近系、新近系、第四系地层发育较为完整。古近系沙河街组四段上亚段、沙河街组三段下亚段沉积时期,陈南断层活动强烈,洼陷中心持续下沉,水体深度较大,气候逐渐由半干旱向潮湿转变[1920],富有机质页岩较发育,厚度达到500~1200 m,目前埋藏深度一般在3200~4000 m,镜质体反射率Ro一般在0.6%~1.0%,已处于生烃门限,富含页岩油[617]。2020年以来,民丰洼陷FY1HF、FY1-1HF等多口页岩油水平井获得高产工业油流,峰值日产原油超百吨,展现了良好的勘探开发前景[421]。本文中以民丰洼陷沙四上亚段纯上次亚段(简称为沙四纯上)为研究目的层段,依据胜利油田地层划分认识,沙四纯上可细分为4个层组,从底到顶依次为纯上4层组、纯上3层组、纯上2层组、纯上1层组。

  • 2 页岩岩相类型

  • 前人对整个济阳坳陷页岩岩相开展了大量研究,形成了多套岩相类型划分方案。陈世悦等[22]依据矿物成分、沉积构造和有机质含量,将济阳坳陷东营凹陷沙四上亚段—沙三下亚段页岩岩相划分为8个大类、17个小类;王勇等[23]依据“岩石组分、沉积构造、碳酸盐质结构和有机质丰度”将济阳坳陷古近系沙四上亚段—沙三下亚段页岩划分为纹层状、层状和块状3大类20小类岩相(纹层状,单层厚度小于1 mm;层状,单层厚度大于等于1 mm;块状,薄片下基本无定向组分)。刘惠民等[10]等基于“岩石组分、沉积构造、碳酸盐质结构和有机质丰度”四端元划分方案,将东营凹陷沙四上亚段泥页岩划分为20类。黎茂稳等[3]认为有机相与沉积环境和成烃产物紧密相关,通过全岩矿物页岩岩相分类叠合有机相分类进一步细分了陆相页岩岩相类型。以上对断陷盆地页岩的岩相划分方案尽管在类型数量上具有一定差异,但依据“矿物组分、沉积构造、有机质含量”三大关键要素来进行页岩岩相划分已基本形成共识。本文在考虑民丰洼陷页岩各要素特征的基础上,基于矿物组分、沉积构造、有机质含量对民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩岩相进行了划分。

  • 图1 民丰洼陷构造位置及地层发育简图

  • Fig.1 Diagram of structural location and stratigraphic development of Minfeng Sub-sag

  • 2.1 矿物组分特征

  • 民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩矿物类型多样,主要以石英、黏土矿物和方解石为主,部分斜长石和白云石,少量黄铁矿和菱铁矿。根据长英质矿物(石英和长石)、碳酸盐矿物(方解石、白云石、菱铁矿等)、黏土矿物三端元,以相对含量50%(质量分数,用w表示,下同)为界,将目的层段页岩分为碳酸盐页岩(w(碳酸盐矿物)≥50%)、黏土页岩(w(黏土矿物)≥50%)、长英质页岩(w(长英质矿物)≥50%)和混积页岩(碳酸盐矿物、黏土矿物、长英质矿物均小于50%);混积页岩依据矿物含量再细分为三类,碳酸质混积页岩(33%<w(碳酸盐矿物)<50%、黏土质混积页岩(33% w(黏土矿物)<50%)、长英质混积页岩(33%<w(长英质矿物)<50%)。利用D/max-2500PC 衍射仪对民丰洼陷10口井1147块样品进行了全岩矿物分析,绘制了矿物含量三角图(图2(a)),表明民丰洼陷沙四纯上以混积页岩为主,部分碳酸盐页岩和长英质页岩,少量黏土质页岩;混积页岩中以碳酸盐质混积页岩和长英质混积页岩最发育,其次为黏土质混积页岩。

  • 2.2 沉积构造特征

  • 利用薄片观察,对民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩沉积构造特征进行分析。580块薄片鉴定结果表明民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩以纹层状构造为主(占比78%),部分层状构造(占比20%),少量块状构造(图2(b),N为样品数量)。显微镜下观察可见粉砂质纹层、黏土质纹层、碳酸盐质纹层、有机质纹层以及混积纹层(即纹层主要由黏土矿物、长英质矿物、碳酸盐矿物及有机质等混积而成),纹层的厚度在微米至毫米级不等;纹层组合形式主要有黏土粉砂混积纹层+有机质纹层、粉砂质纹层+黏土粉砂混积纹层+黏土纹层、黏土粉砂混积纹层+黏土纹层、黏土粉砂混积纹层+碳酸盐质纹层、黏土粉砂混积纹层+碳酸盐质纹层+有机质纹层、黏土粉砂混积纹层+碳酸盐质纹层+黏土纹层等6种,以黏土粉砂混积纹层+碳酸盐质纹层+有机质纹层最常见。

  • 图2 民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩岩相分类要素特征

  • Fig.2 Triangle diagram of mineral content of E2s4cs shale in Minfeng Sub-sag

  • 2.3 有机质含量特征

  • 沉积盆地中有机质丰度与生成油气的数量有着直接相关,其评价指标有有机碳含量(TOC)、氯仿沥青“A”、总烃含量等,其中TOC是最常用指标。本文中以w(TOC)代表页岩中有机质含量,以w(TOC)≥2%、1≤w(TOC)<2%、w(TOC)<1%分别作为富有机质、含有机质、贫有机质划分界限。利用LECO CS844型碳硫分析仪对民丰洼陷沙四纯上194个页岩样品进行了有机碳含量测试,结果表明TOC峰值为2%~3%,富有机质页岩占比93%,含有机质页岩占比6%,贫有机质页岩占比1%,整体上以富有机质页岩为主(图2(c))。

  • 2.4 岩相类型及特征

  • 综合矿物组分、沉积构造、有机质含量特征,认为民丰洼陷发育4种主要岩相类型:富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩、富有机质纹层状黏土质混积页岩、富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩。

  • 富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩:岩心颜色呈深灰色、灰黑色,明暗相间纹层发育,纹层连续性好,多呈水平状,局部呈波状、透镜状。显微镜下观察,明暗相间纹层清晰,浅色层主要由方解石组成,深色层多为富有机质泥质混积纹层(黏土、泥级长石、石英及有机质组成的纹层,下同),相对方解石纹层较薄,纹层内多见草莓状黄铁矿及有机质碎屑片。方解石多为泥晶结构(图3(a)),部分呈微晶结构(图3(b)),晶体形态各异,有菱形、三角形、椭圆状,晶粒间多见有机质和分散状黄铁矿,方解石纹层内可见少量白云石晶粒,晶粒粒径一般在30~50 μm;少量方解石晶体粗大,干净明亮,呈马牙状晶体紧密排列(图3(c)),垂直纹层生长,在荧光镜下荧光颜色显示有差异,表现为多期成因的特征。富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩有机碳含量高,质量分数一般在2%~4%,泥质纹层有机质富集,有机碳含量一般在3%~6%。

  • 富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩:岩心颜色呈深灰色,以碳酸盐质纹层+混积纹层组合类型为主,纹层连续性好,多呈水平状,也呈明暗相间条纹,但纹层界限较模糊。浅色条纹主要为泥晶方解石纹层,密集程度小于富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩。暗色条纹为混积纹层,纹层厚度大于方解石纹层,成分主要为黏土、石英及长石碎屑、泥晶碳酸盐质,纹层内部有机质呈条带状定向排列(图3(d))。有机碳含量一般在3%~5%。

  • 富有机质纹层状黏土质混积页岩:岩心颜色呈深灰色、灰黑色,岩心观察纹层发育层度差,可见少量浅色纹层,显微镜下观察纹层类型多样,黏土粉砂混积纹层、碳酸盐质纹层、黏土纹层(或有机质纹层)均可见,以黏土纹层+碳酸盐质纹层组合类型为主,黏土纹层明显多于碳酸盐质纹层。碳酸盐质纹层主要为泥晶方解石纹层,部分泥晶方解石纹层含黏土成分较多,单偏光下颜色较暗(图3(e))。黏土纹层及碳酸盐质纹层内部均可见黄绿色油质沥青充填孔隙和浸染矿物表面,碳酸盐质纹层油质沥青更为富集。有机碳含量一般在2%~4%。

  • 图3 民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩岩相镜下特征

  • Fig.3 Microscopic characteristics of shale lithofacies in E2s4cs of Minfeng Sub-sag

  • 富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩:岩心颜色呈深灰色,纹层类型多样,常见粉砂质纹层、黏土质纹层、粉砂-黏土混积纹层,粉砂质纹层最发育,以粉砂质纹层+黏土质纹层组合类型为主。粉砂质纹层厚度一般500~1000 μm,纹层边界不清楚,与黏土质纹层呈过渡状,纹层厚度大于黏土质纹层。黏土质纹层内部有机质呈分散状,少量定向排列(图3(f))。有机碳含量一般在2%~3%。

  • 次要岩相有富有机质纹层状黏土质页岩、富-含有机质层状碳酸盐页岩、富-含有机质层状长英质页岩、富有机质-含有机质层状碳酸盐质混积页岩、富-含有机质层状黏土质混积页岩、富-含有机质层状长英质混积页岩等(图3(g)、(h)、(i)、(j));此外,少量贫-含有机质层-块状碳酸盐岩和贫-含有机质层-块状砂岩呈夹层状发育(图3(k)、(l))。

  • 3 页岩岩相及其组合发育特征及分布规律

  • 目前,常规测井解释仍然是获取岩相纵横向变化的重要手段[25]。民丰洼陷页岩纹层较发育,利用常规测井分别求取矿物含量、有机碳含量及判识纹层发育程度是测井岩相识别的基本思路。本文中基于数据拟合法对矿物组分及有机质含量进行定量计算[26]。对于纹层发育程度,通过岩心标定,在标准刻度下声波、密度、中子等三孔隙度曲线呈现同向的锯齿状变化,自然伽马和电阻率也类似于该特征,据此,以测井曲线锯齿状特征来对纹层发育程度进行判识[27]

  • 平面页岩岩相组合的识别依赖于地震分析技术[28],对比多种地震分析技术,本文中选取波形分类地震相用于刻画民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩平面岩相组合分布。地震波形包含了地震所有的相关信息,如反射模式、相位、频率、振幅等信息,它代表产生其反射的沉积物的岩性组合、层理和沉积特征,沉积地层的任何物性参数的变化总是反映在地震道波形形状的变化上[29-30]。波形分类地震相的基本原理是利用地震道波形特征对某一层内地震数据道进行逐道对比,细致刻画地震信号的横向变化,从而得到地震异常体平面分布规律。其技术方法是基于神经网络技术,在地震反射层段内对地震道进行训练,通过多次迭代之后构造合成地震道,然后与实际地震数据进行对比,再通过自适应试验和误差处理,合成道在每次迭代后被改变,在模型道和实际地震道之间寻找更好的相关性。其特点是在某一目的层段内估算地震信号的可变性,利用神经网络算法对地震道波形进行分类并把这种分类形成离散的“地震相”,再根据“拟合度”准则对实际地震道进行对比、分类,细致刻画出地震信号的横向变化得出地震波形分类平面分布图,最后与其他地质资料进行对比,对地震相做出综合性地质解释,达到刻画不同沉积体的目的[31-32]。波形分类地震相对振幅绝对值的变化和噪音不敏感,因而能更好地反映页岩变化规律。

  • 3.1 单井岩相及其组合发育特征

  • 对民丰洼陷多口重点取心井沙四纯上页岩岩相进行识别。以FY1-1HF井为例,识别结果表明民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩主要以混积页岩岩相为主(图4,其中GR为自然伽马,AC为声波时差,Rd为深侧向电阻率,DEN为密度,CNL为中子测井)。纯上4层组主要发育富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩夹纹层-层状黏土质混积页岩及少量碳酸盐岩页岩岩相组合;纯上3层组主要发富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层夹少量碳酸盐页岩岩相组合;纯上2层组发育2类岩相组合,富有机质纹层状黏土质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩岩相组合,富有机质纹层状黏土质混积页岩与碳酸盐质混积页岩互层岩相组合;纯上1层组发育2类岩相组合,富有机质层状碳酸盐质混积页岩夹黏土质混积页岩岩相组合,富有机质纹层-层状黏土质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩岩相组合。整体上,FY1-1HF井沉积区,碳酸盐质混积页岩和黏土质混积页岩最发育,沙四纯上沉积早期(纯上4层组),碳酸盐质混积页岩的厚度较大,层状结构较发育,向上黏土质混积页岩的厚度逐渐变大,纹层结构较发育。

  • 3.2 剖面岩相及其组合发育特征

  • 在典型井页岩岩相及其组合识别划分的基础上,通过多口页岩井测井解释及连井对比,进一步明确了民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩岩相及其相组合纵向和横向发育分布特征。

  • 从近垂直边界断层岩相及其组合分布剖面来看,洼陷厚度中心主要发育富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩;南部边缘低隆起区主要发育富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩,厚度较薄;中间带主要发育富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩和黏土质混积页岩,厚度中等(图5)。各层组岩相及其组合也具有较大差异:纯上4层组,从北向南依次发育3种岩相组合:富有机质纹层-层状长英质混积页岩夹砂条岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩夹黏土质混积页岩岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩夹混积页岩岩相组合;纯上3层组从北向南依次发育4种岩相组合:富有机质纹层-层状长英质混积页岩夹砂条岩相组合、富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩夹混积页岩岩相组合;纯上2层组从北向南依次发育5种岩相组合,富有机质纹层-层状长英质混积页岩夹砂条岩相组合、富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层岩相组合、富有机质纹层状黏土质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩夹混积页岩岩相组合;纯上1层组从北向南依次发育5种岩相组合,即富有机质纹层-层状长英质混积页岩夹砂条岩相组合、富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩岩相组合、富有机质层状碳酸盐质混积页岩夹黏土质混积页岩岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩夹混积页岩岩相组合。

  • 图4 民丰洼陷FY1-1HF井沙四纯上页岩岩相及其组合发育特征

  • Fig.4 Development characteristics of shale lithofacies and their combinations in the E2s4cs of well FY1-1HF, Minfeng Sub-sag

  • 3.3 平面岩相及其组合分布规律

  • 利用波形聚类地震相分析技术对民丰洼陷沙四纯上各层组波形特征进行了提取并平面成图。以纯上3层组为例,图6是该层组地震波形分类结果,平面上呈现多个颜色分区,显示纯上3层组页岩地震波形类型多样,可以划分为6个典型区域(用①到⑥表示),指示了平面上页岩岩相及其组合的变化。利用衍射确定的岩相类型及测井曲线所显示的岩相组合特征对各区域进行了标定,认为区域①代表了近控洼断层的砂砾岩相;区域②代表了层状-纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩、砂条岩相组合;区域③代表了纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩岩相组合;区域④代表了纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层岩相组合;区域⑤代表了纹层状碳酸盐页岩夹混积页岩岩相组合;区域⑥代表了纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩夹薄层云岩岩相组合。

  • 图5 民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩岩相组合剖面发育特征

  • Fig.5 South-North cross section of shale lithofacies combinations in the E2s4cs of Minfeng Sub-sag

  • 综合波形分类地震相图标定结果及单井矿物、有机质含量及沉积构造类型测井解释结果,绘制了民丰洼陷沙四纯上各层组岩相组合平面分布图(图7)。图中显示民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩岩相组合在平面上整体呈近东西向不规则条带状有序展布的特点,从北部物源区到南部湖盆中心区,长英质逐渐减少,黏土质和碳酸盐质逐渐增多,依次发育富有机质层-纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩及少量砂条岩相组合、富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩相岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩夹混积页岩岩相组合。纯上4层组沉积时期,湖盆水体最为咸化,富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩夹黏土质混积页岩发育;纯上3至1层组,湖盆水体加深且逐渐淡化,整体上岩相展布规律一致,但各岩相组合带的分布范围具有较大差异,富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩岩相组合的分布范围逐步扩大,而富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层岩相组合的分布范围逐步缩小;在湖盆东部边界附近,地势较平缓且具有低凸起特征,发育富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩夹云条的岩相组合。另外,从纯上4个层组岩相组合变化来看,在湖盆水体加深、湖盆范围扩大、砂砾岩体整体退积的沉积环境背景下,长英质混积页岩的范围有逐步扩大趋势且越过了沉降中心(东营凹陷古近系属半地堑盆地,陈南断层为控凹断层,在沙四段沉积时期持续活动,沉积中心和沉降中心均紧邻陈南断层分布[33]),说明在陡坡带湖盆水体加深时期,湖泊表面层流作用较明显,能将陆源物质输送较远的距离,且可不受湖盆底形的限制。以上成果对深化断陷盆地陡坡带页岩岩相及其组合分布的认识具有重要意义。

  • 3.4 岩相及其组合发育控制因素

  • 民丰凹陷沙四上亚段沉积期沉积环境整体上表现为气候由半湿润干旱向湿润转变,碎屑物源输入量逐步增加,水深由半深水逐步变化为深水;水体盐度逐步降低,由咸水逐步淡化为半咸水;水体还原性也逐步减弱[1619-20](图4)。古盐度和古水深一定程度上影响着生物古生产力和保存条件,控制着页岩的有机质丰度与分布,有机质含量高值区往往位于咸水—半咸水水深相对较深处。民丰洼陷沙四纯上沉积期水体以咸水到半咸水为主,营养元素富集,为大量浮游生物的繁盛提供了营养保证,另外水深较大,水体分层性较明显,利于有机质保存和水平纹层发育,形成了纹层发育的富有机质页岩。受陡坡近物源的影响,陆源组分相对较高,达到50%~80%,形成陆源组分和碳酸盐组分的混积页岩,长英质组分在粗碎屑边缘带和深洼区最发育,形成长英质混积页岩发育区,其外缘形成碳酸盐质混积页岩和黏土质混积页岩发育区,平面上呈现条带状展布特征;在湖盆南部边缘,陆源物质的影响减弱,形成碳酸盐页岩发育区。受古水深加大及古盐度降低的影响,纵向上,碳酸盐组分的含量逐步降低,在深洼区沙四纯上底部碳酸盐质混积页岩较发育,向上长英质混积页岩较发育。

  • 图6 民丰洼陷沙四纯上3层组波形分类地震相图及其岩相对应关系

  • Fig.6 Waveform classification seismic phase and its rock correspondence relationship of thethird layer of the E2s4cs, Minfeng Sub-sag

  • 图7 民丰洼陷沙四纯上各层组页岩岩相组合平面分布

  • Fig.7 Distribution of shale lithofacies combinations in each thin layer of the E2s4cs, Minfeng Sub-sag

  • 4 页岩岩相组合分布模式及其地质意义

  • 根据以上对民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩岩相纵横向变化的刻画,建立了断陷盆地陡坡深陷区页岩岩相及其组合分布模式,如图8。剖面上,从物源区及砂砾岩扇体向前,依次可发育富有机质纹层状长英质页岩-长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩及少量砂条、富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩夹混积页岩4种岩相组合,在湖水处于浅湖—半深湖、水体较为咸化时,可发育富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩夹黏土质混积页岩岩相组合。富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩岩相组合发育在洼陷沉积中心,厚度最大;富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质页岩夹混积页岩岩相组合在盆地低隆起区较发育,厚度较薄;中间带发育富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层岩相组合,厚度中等。平面上,富有机质纹层状长英质页岩-长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩及少量砂条岩相组合沿砂砾岩体及边界断层展布,岩相组合带宽度较窄,在砂砾岩体前端宽度略大;富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩岩相组合沿盆地长轴方向带状展布,宽度较大,宽度受到湖盆表层低密度层流作用影响范围的控制;富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩夹黏土质混积页岩岩相组合、富有机质碳酸盐页岩夹混积页岩岩相组合也沿盆地长轴方向带状展布,其中富有机质碳酸盐页岩夹混积页岩岩相组合在低隆起及梁状凸起处分布范围较宽。2020年胜利油田年在济阳坳陷东营凹陷缓坡带博兴洼陷FYP1井获得页岩油产能突破,证实纹层状碳酸盐页岩夹黏土质混积页岩岩相组合具有较好的含油性,之后在陡坡带民丰洼陷部署FY1HF、FY1-1HF钻探碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层岩相组合也取得了成功,认为纹层状碳酸盐页岩夹黏土质混积页岩岩相组合、碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层岩相组合是东营凹陷沙四上亚段优质岩相组合、碳酸盐页岩和碳酸盐质混积页岩是优质储集岩相[1621]。但本文研究结果显示碳酸盐页岩和碳酸盐质混积页岩在陡坡带洼陷的分布范围和厚度较为局限,不利于作为陡坡带页岩油勘探部署长期规划目标。为了进一步明确民丰洼陷沙四上纯上次亚段4种主要岩相岩相的储集性特征,挑选典型样品进行孔隙度分析。从孔隙度分布图来看,民丰洼陷碳酸盐页岩的孔隙度分布区间较大,0~13%均有分布,主要分布在5%~10%;碳酸盐质混积页岩的孔隙度分布较为集中,主要分布在6%~10%;长英质混积页岩的孔隙度一般较大,主要分布在8%~13%;黏土质混积页岩的孔隙度分布区间较大,呈现多峰形态(图9)。整体上长英质混积页岩的孔隙度较高,次为碳酸盐页岩和碳酸盐质混积页岩,黏土质混积页岩孔隙度较差,因此长英质混积页岩相也将是未来的勘探重要目标。本文中建立的民丰洼陷页岩岩相组合分布模式不仅对钻探碳酸盐页岩和碳酸盐质混积页岩选区选层具有指导意义,也可对未来风险钻探长英质混积页岩奠定基础,进一步拓展断陷盆地陡坡带页岩油勘探空间,还可对地质条件相似的东部断陷盆地群陡坡带页岩岩相评价提供重要参考。

  • 图8 民丰洼陷沙四纯上页岩岩相组合分布模式

  • Fig.8 Distribution pattern of shale lithofacies combinations of the E2s4cs, Minfeng Sub-sag

  • 图9 民丰洼陷沙四纯上4种主要岩相孔隙度分布特征

  • Fig.9 Porosity distribution characteristics of four main types of shale lithofacies in the E2s4cs, Minfeng Sub-sag

  • 5 结论

  • (1)民丰洼陷沙四上纯上次亚段页岩以富有机质、纹层发育、矿物混积为典型特征,发育富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩、黏土质混积页岩、长英质混积页岩及碳酸盐页岩4种主要岩相类型;洼陷沉积中心主要发育富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩;南部边缘水下低隆起区主要发育富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩;中间带主要发育富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩和黏土质混积页岩。

  • (2)从北部物源区到洼陷南部边缘,依次发育4种岩相组合:富有机质层-纹层状长英质页岩、长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩及少量砂岩薄层岩相组合、富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐质混积页岩与黏土质混积页岩互层岩相组合、富有机质纹层状碳酸盐页岩夹混积页岩岩相组合。

  • (3)民丰洼陷沙四上纯上次亚段各层组岩相组合在平面上呈近东西向不规则条带状展布,其中富有机质纹层状长英质混积页岩夹碳酸盐质混积页岩岩相组合展布范围最广。在低隆起及梁状凸起处富有机质碳酸盐页岩夹混积页岩岩相组合发育,分布范围较宽。

  • (4)陡坡带湖盆范围扩大、水体加深时,湖泊水体表面层流作用较强,输送陆源物质距离较远,导致长英质混积页岩的分布范围广,不受砂砾岩体整体退积及古湖盆底形的控制。

  • 参考文献

    • [1] 贾承造,王祖纲,姜林,等.中国页岩油勘探开发研究进展与科学技术问题[J].世界石油工业,2024,31(4):1-11,13.JIA Chengzao,WANG Zugang,JIANG Lin,et al.Progress and key scientific and technological problems of shale oil exploration and development in China[J].World Petroleum Industry,2024,31(4):1-11,13.

    • [2] 马永生,蔡勋育,赵培荣,等.中国陆相页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J].地质学报,2022,96(1):155-171.MA Yongsheng,CAI Xunyu,ZHAO Peirong,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration practices of continental shale oil in China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2022,96(1):155-171.

    • [3] 黎茂稳,马晓潇,金之钧,等.中国海、陆相页岩层系岩相组合多样性与非常规油气勘探意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2022,43(1):1-25.LI Maowen,MA Xiaoxiao,JIN Zhijun,et al.Diversity in the lithofacies assemblages of marine and lacustrine shale strata and significance for unconventional petroleum exploration in China[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2022,43(1):1-25.

    • [4] 刘惠民,李军亮,刘鹏,等.济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集条件与勘探战略方向[J].石油学报,2022,43(12):1717-1729.LIU Huimin,LI Junliang,LIU Peng,et al.Enrichment conditions and strategic exploration direction of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(12):1717-1729.

    • [5] 蔚远江,王红岩,刘德勋,等.中国陆相页岩油示范区发展现状及建设可行性评价指标体系[J].地球科学,2023,48(1):191-205.YU Yuanjiang,WANG Hongyan,LIU Dexun,et al.Development status and feasibility evaluation index system of continental shale oil demonstration area in China[J].Earth Science,2023,48(1):191-205.

    • [6] 刘惠民.济阳坳陷古近系页岩油地质特殊性及勘探实践:以沙河街组四段上亚段—沙河街组三段下亚段为例[J].石油学报,2022,43(5):581-594.LIU Huimin.Geological particularity and exploration practice of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang depression:a case study of the upper submember of Member 4 to the lower submember of Member 3 of Shahejie Formation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(5):581-594.

    • [7] 赵贤正,金凤鸣,周立宏,等.渤海湾盆地风险探井歧页1H井沙河街组一段页岩油勘探突破及其意义[J].石油学报,2022,43(10):1369-1382.ZHAO Xianzheng,JIN Fengming,ZHOU Lihong,et al.Breakthrough and significance of shale oil exploration in Member 1 of Shahejie Formation of Well Qiye1H,a risk exploratory well in Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(10):1369-1382.

    • [8] 姚红生,昝灵,高玉巧,等.苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集高产主控因素与勘探重大突破[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(5):776-783.YAO Hongsheng,ZAN Ling,GAO Yuqiao,et al.Main controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and significant discovery in second member of Paleogene Funing Formation,Qintong Sag,Subei Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2021,43(5):776-783.

    • [9] 马存飞,黄文俊,杜争利,等.陆相湖盆页岩岩相分类方案及其意义:以沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2022,53(9):3287-3300.MA Cunfei,HUANG Wenjun,DU Zhengli,et al.Shale lithofacies classification scheme of continental lake basin and its significance:a case of E2 Member of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2022,53(9):3287-3300.

    • [10] 刘惠民,王勇,杨永红,等.东营凹陷细粒混积岩发育环境及其岩相组合:以沙四上亚段泥页岩细粒沉积为例[J].地球科学,2020,45(10):3543-3555.LIU Huimin,WANG Yong,YANG Yonghong,et al.Sedimentary environment and lithofacies of fine-grained hybrid sedimentary in Dongying Sag:a case of fine-grained sedimentary system of the Es4[J].Earth Science,2020,45(10):3543-3555.

    • [11] 王优先.陆相页岩油成藏地质条件及富集高产主控因素:以泌阳凹陷为例[J].断块油气田,2015,22(5):588-593.WANG Youxian.Geologic conditions of continental shale oil accumulation and main controlling factors of enrichment and high production:taking Biyang Depression as an example[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2015,22(5):588-593.

    • [12] 昝灵,骆卫峰,印燕铃,等.苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油形成条件及有利区评价[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(2):233-241.ZAN Ling,LUO Weifeng,YIN Yanling,et al.Formation conditions of shale oil and favorable targets in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Qintong Sag,Subei Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2021,43(2):233-241.

    • [13] 赵文智,卞从胜,蒲秀刚,等.中国典型咸化湖盆页岩油富集与流动特征及在“甜点”评价中的意义[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2023,47(5):25-37.ZHAO Wenzhi,BIAN Congsheng,PU Xiugang,et al.Enrichment and flow characteristics of shale oil in typical salinized lake basins in China and its significance for "sweet spot" evaluation[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2023,47(5):25-37.

    • [14] 冯国奇,李吉君,刘洁文,等.泌阳凹陷页岩油富集及可动性探讨[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(6):1236-1246.FENG Guoqi,LI Jijun,LIU Jiewen,et al.Discussion on the enrichment and mobility of continental shale oil in Biyang Depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(6):1236-1246.

    • [15] 李浩,王保华,陆建林,等.东濮凹陷古近系页岩油富集地质条件与勘探前景[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(3):33-41.LI Hao,WANG Baohua,LU Jianlin,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration prospects of Paleogene continental shale oil accumulation in Dongpu Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2021,45(3):33-41.

    • [16] 刘惠民,张顺,王学军,等.陆相断陷盆地页岩岩相组合类型及特征:以济阳坳陷东营凹陷沙四上亚段页岩为例[J].地球科学,2023,48(1):30-48.LIU Huimin,ZHANG Shun,WANG Xuejun,et al.Types and characteristics of shale lithofacies combinations in continental faulted basins:a case study from upper sub-member of Es4 in Dongying Sag,Jiyang depression[J].Earth Science,2023,48(1):30-48.

    • [17] 刘雅利,张顺,刘惠民,等.断陷盆地陡坡带富有机质页岩基本特征及勘探前景:以济阳坳陷为例[J].中国矿业大学学报,2021,50(6):1108-1118.LIU Yali,ZHANG Shun,LIU Huimin,et al.Basic characteristics and exploration prospect of shale in steep slope belt of continental faultedbasin:a case study of Jiyang depression[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2021,50(6):1108-1118.

    • [18] 刘佳庚,王艳忠,操应长,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷民丰洼陷陡坡带深层-超深层碎屑岩优质储层控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2023,44(5):1203-1217.LIU Jiageng,WANG Yanzhong,CAO Yingchang,et al.Factors controlling the development of deep and ultra-deep coarse-grained siliciclastic reservoirs with high quality in the steep slope zone of the Minfeng sub-sag,Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2023,44(5):1203-1217.

    • [19] 杨万芹,蒋有录,王勇.东营凹陷沙三下—沙四上亚段泥页岩岩相沉积环境分析[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(4):19-26.YANG Wanqin,JIANG Youlu,WANG Yong.Study on shale facies sedimentary environment of lower Es3-upper Es4 in Dongying sag[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2015,39(4):19-26.

    • [20] 王勇.济阳坳陷古近系沙三下—沙四上亚段咸化湖盆证据及页岩油气地质意义[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2024,48(3):27-36.WANG Yong.Evidence of Paleogene saline lake basin in the 3rd and 4th members of Shahejie Formation in Jiyang Depression and geological significance of shale oil and gas[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2024,48(3):27-36.

    • [21] 杨勇.济阳陆相断陷盆地页岩油富集高产规律[J].油气地质与采收率,2023,30(1):1-20.YANG Yong.Enrichment and high production regularities of shale oil reservoirs in continental rift basin:a case study of Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2023,30(1):1-20.

    • [22] 陈世悦,张顺,王永诗,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系细粒沉积岩岩相类型及储集层特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):198-208.CHEN Shiyue,ZHANG Shun,WANG Yongshi,et al.Lithofacies types and reservoirs of Paleogene fine-grained sedimentary rocks in Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):198-208.

    • [23] 王勇,王学军,宋国奇,等.渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷泥页岩岩相与页岩油富集关系[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(5):696-704.WANG Yong,WANG Xuejun,SONG Guoqi,et al.Genetic connection between mud shale lithofacies and shale oil enrichment in Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(5):696-704.

    • [24] 王勇,刘惠民,宋国奇,等.济阳坳陷泥页岩细粒沉积体系[J].石油学报,2019,40(4):395-410.WANG Yong,LIU Huimin,SONG Guoqi,et al.Lacustrine shale fine-grained sedimentary system in Jiyang depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(4):395-410.

    • [25] 张益粼,王贵文,宋连腾,等.页岩岩相测井表征方法:以准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组为例[J].地球物理学进展,2023,38(1):393-408.ZHANG Yilin,WANG Guiwen,SONG Lianteng,et al.Logging identification method of shale lithofacies:a study of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J].Progress in Geophysics,2023,38(1):393-408.

    • [26] YAN Jianping,HE Xu,HU Qinhong,et al.Lower Es3 in Zhanhua Sag,Jiyang Depression:a case study for lithofacies classification in lacustrine mud shale[J].Applied Geophysics,2018,15(2):151-164,361.

    • [27] 王敏,朱家俊,余光华,等.罗家地区泥页岩岩相特征及测井分析技术[J].测井技术,2013,37(4):426-431.WANG Min,ZHU Jiajun,YU Guanghua,et al.The shale lithofacies characteristics and logging analysis techniques in Luojia area[J].Well Logging Technology,2013,37(4):426-431.

    • [28] 刘喜武,刘宇巍,郭智奇.陆相页岩油关键甜点要素地球物理表征技术[J].地球物理学进展,2022,37(4):1576-1584.LIU Xiwu,LIU Yuwei,GUO Zhiqi.Key sweet spot factors seismic characterization of continental shale oil[J].Progress in Geophysics,2022,37(4):1576-1584.

    • [29] 陈彦虎,毕建军,邱小斌,等.地震波形指示反演方法及其应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(6):1149-1158.CHEN Yanhu,BI Jianjun,QIU Xiaobin,et al.A method of seismic meme inversion and its application[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(6):1149-1158.

    • [30] 刘玲,王琳霖,吴疆,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部彬长区块上石盒子组7段储层识别与预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2021,42(5):1124-1135.LIU Ling,WANG Linlin,WU Jiang,et al.Reservoir identification and prediction of He7 Member in Binchang block,southern Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2021,42(5):1124-1135.

    • [31] 赵力民,郎晓玲,金凤鸣,等.波形分类技术在隐蔽油藏预测中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(6):53-55.ZHAO Limin,LANG Xiaoling,JIN Fengming,et al.Application of waveform classification technique in the prediction of subtle res ervoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2001,28(6):53-55.

    • [32] 于红枫,王英民,李雪.Stratimagic波形地震相分析在层序地层岩性分析中的应用[J].煤田地质与勘探,2006,34(1):64-67.YU Hongfeng,WANG Yingmin,LI Xue.Application of stratimagic seismic facies technique to lithologic analysis in sequence stratigraphic framework[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,2006,34(1):64-67.

    • [33] 漆家福,肖焕钦,张卫刚.东营凹陷主干边界断层(带)构造几何学、运动学特征及成因解释[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):8-12.QI Jiafu,XIAO Huanqin,ZHANG Weigang.Geometry,kinematics and mechanism interpretation of the major boundary faults in Dongying Sag[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(3):8-12.

  • 参考文献

    • [1] 贾承造,王祖纲,姜林,等.中国页岩油勘探开发研究进展与科学技术问题[J].世界石油工业,2024,31(4):1-11,13.JIA Chengzao,WANG Zugang,JIANG Lin,et al.Progress and key scientific and technological problems of shale oil exploration and development in China[J].World Petroleum Industry,2024,31(4):1-11,13.

    • [2] 马永生,蔡勋育,赵培荣,等.中国陆相页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J].地质学报,2022,96(1):155-171.MA Yongsheng,CAI Xunyu,ZHAO Peirong,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration practices of continental shale oil in China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2022,96(1):155-171.

    • [3] 黎茂稳,马晓潇,金之钧,等.中国海、陆相页岩层系岩相组合多样性与非常规油气勘探意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2022,43(1):1-25.LI Maowen,MA Xiaoxiao,JIN Zhijun,et al.Diversity in the lithofacies assemblages of marine and lacustrine shale strata and significance for unconventional petroleum exploration in China[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2022,43(1):1-25.

    • [4] 刘惠民,李军亮,刘鹏,等.济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集条件与勘探战略方向[J].石油学报,2022,43(12):1717-1729.LIU Huimin,LI Junliang,LIU Peng,et al.Enrichment conditions and strategic exploration direction of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(12):1717-1729.

    • [5] 蔚远江,王红岩,刘德勋,等.中国陆相页岩油示范区发展现状及建设可行性评价指标体系[J].地球科学,2023,48(1):191-205.YU Yuanjiang,WANG Hongyan,LIU Dexun,et al.Development status and feasibility evaluation index system of continental shale oil demonstration area in China[J].Earth Science,2023,48(1):191-205.

    • [6] 刘惠民.济阳坳陷古近系页岩油地质特殊性及勘探实践:以沙河街组四段上亚段—沙河街组三段下亚段为例[J].石油学报,2022,43(5):581-594.LIU Huimin.Geological particularity and exploration practice of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang depression:a case study of the upper submember of Member 4 to the lower submember of Member 3 of Shahejie Formation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(5):581-594.

    • [7] 赵贤正,金凤鸣,周立宏,等.渤海湾盆地风险探井歧页1H井沙河街组一段页岩油勘探突破及其意义[J].石油学报,2022,43(10):1369-1382.ZHAO Xianzheng,JIN Fengming,ZHOU Lihong,et al.Breakthrough and significance of shale oil exploration in Member 1 of Shahejie Formation of Well Qiye1H,a risk exploratory well in Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(10):1369-1382.

    • [8] 姚红生,昝灵,高玉巧,等.苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集高产主控因素与勘探重大突破[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(5):776-783.YAO Hongsheng,ZAN Ling,GAO Yuqiao,et al.Main controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and significant discovery in second member of Paleogene Funing Formation,Qintong Sag,Subei Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2021,43(5):776-783.

    • [9] 马存飞,黄文俊,杜争利,等.陆相湖盆页岩岩相分类方案及其意义:以沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2022,53(9):3287-3300.MA Cunfei,HUANG Wenjun,DU Zhengli,et al.Shale lithofacies classification scheme of continental lake basin and its significance:a case of E2 Member of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2022,53(9):3287-3300.

    • [10] 刘惠民,王勇,杨永红,等.东营凹陷细粒混积岩发育环境及其岩相组合:以沙四上亚段泥页岩细粒沉积为例[J].地球科学,2020,45(10):3543-3555.LIU Huimin,WANG Yong,YANG Yonghong,et al.Sedimentary environment and lithofacies of fine-grained hybrid sedimentary in Dongying Sag:a case of fine-grained sedimentary system of the Es4[J].Earth Science,2020,45(10):3543-3555.

    • [11] 王优先.陆相页岩油成藏地质条件及富集高产主控因素:以泌阳凹陷为例[J].断块油气田,2015,22(5):588-593.WANG Youxian.Geologic conditions of continental shale oil accumulation and main controlling factors of enrichment and high production:taking Biyang Depression as an example[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2015,22(5):588-593.

    • [12] 昝灵,骆卫峰,印燕铃,等.苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油形成条件及有利区评价[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(2):233-241.ZAN Ling,LUO Weifeng,YIN Yanling,et al.Formation conditions of shale oil and favorable targets in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Qintong Sag,Subei Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2021,43(2):233-241.

    • [13] 赵文智,卞从胜,蒲秀刚,等.中国典型咸化湖盆页岩油富集与流动特征及在“甜点”评价中的意义[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2023,47(5):25-37.ZHAO Wenzhi,BIAN Congsheng,PU Xiugang,et al.Enrichment and flow characteristics of shale oil in typical salinized lake basins in China and its significance for "sweet spot" evaluation[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2023,47(5):25-37.

    • [14] 冯国奇,李吉君,刘洁文,等.泌阳凹陷页岩油富集及可动性探讨[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(6):1236-1246.FENG Guoqi,LI Jijun,LIU Jiewen,et al.Discussion on the enrichment and mobility of continental shale oil in Biyang Depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(6):1236-1246.

    • [15] 李浩,王保华,陆建林,等.东濮凹陷古近系页岩油富集地质条件与勘探前景[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(3):33-41.LI Hao,WANG Baohua,LU Jianlin,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration prospects of Paleogene continental shale oil accumulation in Dongpu Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2021,45(3):33-41.

    • [16] 刘惠民,张顺,王学军,等.陆相断陷盆地页岩岩相组合类型及特征:以济阳坳陷东营凹陷沙四上亚段页岩为例[J].地球科学,2023,48(1):30-48.LIU Huimin,ZHANG Shun,WANG Xuejun,et al.Types and characteristics of shale lithofacies combinations in continental faulted basins:a case study from upper sub-member of Es4 in Dongying Sag,Jiyang depression[J].Earth Science,2023,48(1):30-48.

    • [17] 刘雅利,张顺,刘惠民,等.断陷盆地陡坡带富有机质页岩基本特征及勘探前景:以济阳坳陷为例[J].中国矿业大学学报,2021,50(6):1108-1118.LIU Yali,ZHANG Shun,LIU Huimin,et al.Basic characteristics and exploration prospect of shale in steep slope belt of continental faultedbasin:a case study of Jiyang depression[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2021,50(6):1108-1118.

    • [18] 刘佳庚,王艳忠,操应长,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷民丰洼陷陡坡带深层-超深层碎屑岩优质储层控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2023,44(5):1203-1217.LIU Jiageng,WANG Yanzhong,CAO Yingchang,et al.Factors controlling the development of deep and ultra-deep coarse-grained siliciclastic reservoirs with high quality in the steep slope zone of the Minfeng sub-sag,Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2023,44(5):1203-1217.

    • [19] 杨万芹,蒋有录,王勇.东营凹陷沙三下—沙四上亚段泥页岩岩相沉积环境分析[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(4):19-26.YANG Wanqin,JIANG Youlu,WANG Yong.Study on shale facies sedimentary environment of lower Es3-upper Es4 in Dongying sag[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2015,39(4):19-26.

    • [20] 王勇.济阳坳陷古近系沙三下—沙四上亚段咸化湖盆证据及页岩油气地质意义[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2024,48(3):27-36.WANG Yong.Evidence of Paleogene saline lake basin in the 3rd and 4th members of Shahejie Formation in Jiyang Depression and geological significance of shale oil and gas[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2024,48(3):27-36.

    • [21] 杨勇.济阳陆相断陷盆地页岩油富集高产规律[J].油气地质与采收率,2023,30(1):1-20.YANG Yong.Enrichment and high production regularities of shale oil reservoirs in continental rift basin:a case study of Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2023,30(1):1-20.

    • [22] 陈世悦,张顺,王永诗,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系细粒沉积岩岩相类型及储集层特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):198-208.CHEN Shiyue,ZHANG Shun,WANG Yongshi,et al.Lithofacies types and reservoirs of Paleogene fine-grained sedimentary rocks in Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):198-208.

    • [23] 王勇,王学军,宋国奇,等.渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷泥页岩岩相与页岩油富集关系[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(5):696-704.WANG Yong,WANG Xuejun,SONG Guoqi,et al.Genetic connection between mud shale lithofacies and shale oil enrichment in Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(5):696-704.

    • [24] 王勇,刘惠民,宋国奇,等.济阳坳陷泥页岩细粒沉积体系[J].石油学报,2019,40(4):395-410.WANG Yong,LIU Huimin,SONG Guoqi,et al.Lacustrine shale fine-grained sedimentary system in Jiyang depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(4):395-410.

    • [25] 张益粼,王贵文,宋连腾,等.页岩岩相测井表征方法:以准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组为例[J].地球物理学进展,2023,38(1):393-408.ZHANG Yilin,WANG Guiwen,SONG Lianteng,et al.Logging identification method of shale lithofacies:a study of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J].Progress in Geophysics,2023,38(1):393-408.

    • [26] YAN Jianping,HE Xu,HU Qinhong,et al.Lower Es3 in Zhanhua Sag,Jiyang Depression:a case study for lithofacies classification in lacustrine mud shale[J].Applied Geophysics,2018,15(2):151-164,361.

    • [27] 王敏,朱家俊,余光华,等.罗家地区泥页岩岩相特征及测井分析技术[J].测井技术,2013,37(4):426-431.WANG Min,ZHU Jiajun,YU Guanghua,et al.The shale lithofacies characteristics and logging analysis techniques in Luojia area[J].Well Logging Technology,2013,37(4):426-431.

    • [28] 刘喜武,刘宇巍,郭智奇.陆相页岩油关键甜点要素地球物理表征技术[J].地球物理学进展,2022,37(4):1576-1584.LIU Xiwu,LIU Yuwei,GUO Zhiqi.Key sweet spot factors seismic characterization of continental shale oil[J].Progress in Geophysics,2022,37(4):1576-1584.

    • [29] 陈彦虎,毕建军,邱小斌,等.地震波形指示反演方法及其应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(6):1149-1158.CHEN Yanhu,BI Jianjun,QIU Xiaobin,et al.A method of seismic meme inversion and its application[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(6):1149-1158.

    • [30] 刘玲,王琳霖,吴疆,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部彬长区块上石盒子组7段储层识别与预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2021,42(5):1124-1135.LIU Ling,WANG Linlin,WU Jiang,et al.Reservoir identification and prediction of He7 Member in Binchang block,southern Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2021,42(5):1124-1135.

    • [31] 赵力民,郎晓玲,金凤鸣,等.波形分类技术在隐蔽油藏预测中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(6):53-55.ZHAO Limin,LANG Xiaoling,JIN Fengming,et al.Application of waveform classification technique in the prediction of subtle res ervoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2001,28(6):53-55.

    • [32] 于红枫,王英民,李雪.Stratimagic波形地震相分析在层序地层岩性分析中的应用[J].煤田地质与勘探,2006,34(1):64-67.YU Hongfeng,WANG Yingmin,LI Xue.Application of stratimagic seismic facies technique to lithologic analysis in sequence stratigraphic framework[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,2006,34(1):64-67.

    • [33] 漆家福,肖焕钦,张卫刚.东营凹陷主干边界断层(带)构造几何学、运动学特征及成因解释[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):8-12.QI Jiafu,XIAO Huanqin,ZHANG Weigang.Geometry,kinematics and mechanism interpretation of the major boundary faults in Dongying Sag[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(3):8-12.