引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览次   下载 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
基于X射线和伽马源的密度测井数值模拟
张锋1,2,李亚芬1,2,信毅3,苏波4,吴赫1,2,张泉滢1,2,刘军涛1,2
(1.中国石油大学地球科学与技术学院,山东青岛 266580;2.海洋国家实验室海洋矿产资源评价与探测技术功能实验室, 山东青岛 266071;3.中国石油塔里木油田分公司勘探开发研究院,新疆库尔勒 841000;4.中国石油集团测井有限公司塔里木事业部,新疆库尔勒 841001)
摘要:
通过XCOM程序计算和分析不同介质发生光电效应和康普顿散射的衰减系数随射线能量的变化规律,并利用蒙特卡罗模拟方法研究基于X射线和137Cs伽马源的地层散射能谱以及密度测井响应和精度。结果表明,由于所采用的X射线能量比0.662 MeV的伽马射线低,对于同种地层介质,X射线衰减快,密度越大,差异越明显;在源距相同的条件下,较低能量的X射线源地层密度响应灵敏度比137Cs伽马源的高,但受岩性影响更大;在考虑源强的情况下,当X射线源对应源距为33 cm、伽马源对应源距为38 cm时,X射线源的计数统计性与伽马源的计数统计性相当,X射线源的密度响应灵敏度比伽马源的高,且X射线源的密度测量不确定度小,测量精度高,而伽马源的密度测量不确定度大,测量精度低。X射线源可以替代137Cs伽马源进行密度测井,但在仪器设计、能谱处理和密度计算等方面还需要进行深入研究。
关键词:  X射线源  伽马源  密度测井  衰减系数  蒙特卡罗方法
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2018.01.007
分类号:P631
文献标识码:A
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41374125,41574119);国家科技重大专项(2017ZX05019005-005);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(14CX05011A,15CX06008A)
Numerical simulation of density logging based on X-ray and gamma ray sources
ZHANG Feng1,2, LI Yafen1,2, XIN Yi3, SU Bo4, WU He1,2, ZHANG Quanying1,2, LIU Juntao1,2
(1.School of Geosciences in China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China;2.Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resources, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266071, China;3.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Tarim Oilfield Company, CNPC, Korla 841000, China;4.CNPC Logging Tarim Business Division, Korla 841001, China)
Abstract:
The attenuation coefficient of photoelectric absorption and Compton scattering for different energy rays with the medium are calculated and analyzed by XCOM.The Monte Carlo method is used to compare the scattering spectrum, the response of density logging, and the precision of X-ray and Cs-137 sources. The results show that because the X-ray energy is lower than that of the 0.662 MeV gamma rays, the X-ray attenuation is faster in the same formation, and this difference is more obvious withincreased density. At the same source-detector distance, the sensitivity to the density of the lower energy X-ray source is higher than that of the Cs-137 source, but is dependent on lithology.Considering the source intensity,when the source-detector distance is 33 cm for the X-ray source and 38 cm for the Cs-137 source, respectively, the counting statistics is equal between the two sources.The sensitivity to the density of the X-ray source is higher than that of the Cs-137 source, and the uncertainty of density measurements of the X-ray source is lower than that of the Cs-137 source, which indicates that the density logging precision of the X-ray source is higher than that of the Cs-137 source. It is concluded that X-ray source can replace gamma ray source for density logging, but further research in instrument design, energy spectrum processing and density calculation is needed.
Key words:  X-ray source  gamma ray source  density logging  attenuation coefficient  Monte Carlo method
版权所有 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版)编辑部 Copyright©2008 All Rights Reserved
主管单位:中华人民共和国教育部 主办单位:中国石油大学(华东)
地址: 青岛市黄岛区长江西路66号中国石油大学期刊社 邮编:266580 电话:0532-86983553 E-mail: journal@upc.edu.cn
本系统由:北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计